Understanding and aligning different stakeholder perspectives is crucial for achieving project success. This study explores how varying interpretations of project success criteria among senior management, project teams, and recipients can lead to project failure. A multiple stakeholder model is proposed to enhance collaboration and reduce the risk of unsuccessful outcomes.
Project management is a critical operational tool that organizations use to handle customized, one-off events across various functions. The effectiveness of project management lies in its ability to manage resources, tasks, activities, and associated timelines. However, project success is not uniformly defined, which has led to a high rate of perceived project failures. A study published in the International Journal of Project Management highlights that project failure often results from differing interpretations of success criteria among multiple stakeholder groups. This article aims to delve into these perceptions, examining how aligning stakeholder views can minimize project failure and enhance successful project outcomes.
Historically, project success has been measured using various instruments and methods, with Pinto and Slevin’s (1987) ‘diagnostic behavioral instrument’ being one of the most cited tools. However, this tool and others like it primarily focus on the project manager’s perspective, often neglecting the views of other key stakeholders such as senior management, the project core team, and project recipients. This oversight can lead to a misalignment in expectations and outcomes, contributing to the perception of project failure.
The failure of projects is a common concern in project management. For instance, the Standish Group (2012) found that 18% of projects fail outright, while 43% are challenged. KPMG (2013) reported similar findings, noting that only 33% of projects were completed on budget, 29% on time, and 35% to scope. These statistics highlight the need for a more inclusive approach to defining project success—one that incorporates the perspectives of all relevant stakeholder groups. By understanding and aligning the different views on what constitutes project success, organizations can reduce the likelihood of project failure.
The study identified communication as a common theme across five stakeholder groups (project manager, client, owner, user, and project team). However, the emphasis on other success dimensions varied among these groups. For example, project managers and users valued time, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction, while senior management focused on strategic benefits and top management support.
The absence of shared success dimensions among certain stakeholder groups, particularly between senior management and project recipients, was a significant finding. This lack of commonality suggests that different stakeholders may prioritize different project outcomes, leading to misaligned expectations and perceptions of success.
Stakeholders’ perceptions of success change throughout the project lifecycle. Clients, for instance, become more aware of their needs as the project progresses, which can result in conflicting requirements between them and project sponsors who set the initial project scope.
The study proposed new dimensions to measure project success, taking into account benefits to the stakeholder group, client/customer-specific issues, and the traditional metrics of time, cost, and quality.
%
According to the Standish Group’s 2012 CHAOS Report, only 39% of projects are considered successful, 43% challenged, 18% failing. Source: Standish Group, 2012 CHAOS Report
%
A McKinsey & Company report found that large IT projects run 45% over budget and 7% over time, while delivering 56% less value than predicted. Source: McKinsey & Company, 2012
The study emphasized the critical role of senior management in defining and supporting project success. Senior management’s involvement is crucial in setting realistic goals, allocating resources, and providing top management support. Similarly, the project core team’s engagement ensures that the project is executed effectively, with attention to detail and a focus on meeting project objectives.
A key outcome of the study was the proposal of a multiple stakeholder model that considers the diverse views of different stakeholder groups. This model aims to enhance the dynamic engagement of stakeholders, allowing for continuous collaboration, capturing changing priorities, and facilitating effective communication. By doing so, organizations can ensure that project success criteria are aligned with the expectations of all stakeholders, leading to more successful project outcomes.
Future research should continue to explore the perceptions of project success across a broader range of industries and project types. Additionally, empirical studies should be conducted to validate the proposed multiple stakeholder model and to refine the success dimensions identified. By doing so, project management as a discipline can develop more inclusive and effective strategies for managing complex projects, ultimately leading to higher rates of success and satisfaction among all stakeholders.
The study’s findings underline the need for a more holistic approach to project management—one that incorporates the perspectives of all relevant stakeholders. By understanding and addressing the different success dimensions valued by various stakeholder groups, organizations can minimize project failure rates and achieve more consistent project success. This approach not only aligns project outcomes with stakeholder expectations but also fosters a more collaborative and motivated project environment.
Learn how aligning personal and company values enhances team trust and performance. Discover the power of person-organization fit in recruitment and the role of respect-for-people culture in creating high-performing teams. Unlock the secrets to effective teamwork and organizational success.
Despite efforts to bridge the gender gap, engineering remains a male-dominated field where women often face unique challenges. This article explores how women engineers navigate their careers by adopting or rejecting masculine norms, the strategies they use to thrive, and the broader implications for achieving true gender equality.
Discover the impact of work-life balance initiatives on employee satisfaction and loyalty, and learn how the alignment of perceptions between managers and employees plays a crucial role in fostering a supportive work environment. Insights from multilevel analysis reveal the importance of personalized support and cultural sensitivity in implementing HR practices.
Gen Z, born between 1996 and 2010, is a generation that thrives on authenticity, digital fluency, and a global consciousness. As they wield significant influence and purchasing power, understanding their values and behaviors is essential for brands, educators, and policymakers aiming to connect meaningfully with this emerging powerhouse.
Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) is a powerful methodology that integrates quality into the design phase of medical device manufacturing, ensuring safety, reliability, and customer satisfaction. This guide explores the essential phases, roles, and best practices for successful DFSS deployment, helping companies meet regulatory demands and enhance product quality.
We delve into the systematic methodologies used to identify and analyze electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage in integrated circuits. Understanding these damage mechanisms is crucial for improving IC design, implementing effective ESD-safe handling procedures, and ensuring the reliability and longevity of electronic devices.
Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Industrial Large Scale Practice (GLSP) are essential regulatory frameworks that ensure the quality, safety, and consistency of products in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and food industries. By adhering to these practices, companies can minimize contamination risks, ensure regulatory compliance, and achieve excellence in large-scale manufacturing operations.
By implementing SPICE-based qualification mechanisms, car manufacturers like Fiat Auto can effectively evaluate their software suppliers, ensuring robust process capabilities and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. This standardized approach not only strengthens supplier relationships but also enhances the reliability and safety of the final automotive products.
As the automotive industry evolves with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles, extending Automotive SPICE becomes crucial. This blog explores how integrating functional safety and cybersecurity within Automotive SPICE ensures reliability, safety, and security for next-generation vehicle architectures.
Discover the critical role of Supplier Agreement Management (SAM) in CMMI Level 2 for effective software acquisition and quality assurance. Learn how integrating non-technical features catalogues can streamline supplier evaluation, minimize risks, and optimize project outcomes.
Business innovation is crucial for staying competitive and relevant. However, achieving successful innovation involves overcoming significant challenges, from developing groundbreaking ideas to ensuring customer adoption and securing a fair share of market value. This article explores key strategies that businesses can implement to navigate these challenges and drive sustained innovation.
Explore the connection between work and mental health, identifies key stressors affecting employees, and offers practical strategies to create supportive and mentally healthy workplaces. By prioritizing mental well-being, organizations can enhance productivity, improve morale, and foster a positive work culture.